Can Tyler’s Testimony be Substantiated

Here are some excerpts from an article appearing in the Denver Post today by journalist John Henderson.

Tyler Hamilton
Tyler Hamilton

Lance’s critics will need more than Tyler’s 60 Minutes interview to strip him of his 7 Tour titles.  Some prosecuting attorneys that deal with grand juries have said that Lance’s case “wasn’t terribly damaged by Hamilton’s astounding allegations.”

“His statements on television were not made under oath.”

“That certain testimony may not be allowed if a grand jury terms it to be too vague and unsubstantiated,” Stuart Slotnik said.  “It’s not healthy if someone has vague and unsubstantiated claims. “

“Possibly more at stake for Armstrong than his wins and reputation is a federal charge.  If enough evidence shows Armstrong did have performance-enhancing drugs express mailed to the team, Armstrong could receive an indictment for mail fraud or conspiracy.”

Mail fraud is a common charge.  It could carry a 25-39 year sentence.

According to the article, Armstrong has some factors working for him. It wouldn’t be an admission of guilt.  Also, Hamilton has maintained his innocence since his 2004 positive test.  He hasn’t offered any physical evidence.  His reputation is already in tatters and the defense could “have a field day.”

The more serious case could be the UCI covering up Armstrong’s positive test in the 1998 Tour de Suisse.  This could be considered a criminal conspiracy.

No one knows what information the grand jury has, so it’s wait and see.